LED – L(ight) E(ncoded) D(angers)

Finally, what until now has been taken for just rumors, is revealing the truth with the strength of more scientific exactitude. As for most of the technological innovations, we are used to observe how the market is not only the way to diffuse them, but also a sort of experimental platform for beta versions, which consumers are rarely aware of. In addition to this, when the PURE scientific community arises doubts, concerns and even proves of real dangers that can affect the wellness of the population, well I don’t know you but I rarely find out a positive and constructive cooperation between Science and Industry, aimed to reach the best solutions for the prior good of the people.

I warmly invite everyone to read carefully articles like this.

I really appreciate and thank this awareness-kind-of-press, for I do believe that a positive human evolution can only be carried on by an aware and watchful humanity.

The challenge that all the enlightened and serious LED companies should accept right now is: finding a way to truly conciliate LED technology and biocompatibility in cooperation with the sane international scientific community (keeping the distance from the mercenary one).

Artificial light is everywhere, like us, human beings; but let’s not forget that we have biologically evolved within the Solar spectrum for millions of years, and that newborn LED light is so far from that frequency range completeness. It’s a great mistake, or better, a stupid risk to underestimate this fact.